Obama’s preparing to reverse Bush-era rules on abortion and contraception, and apparently taking a hard look at abstinence-only education. Hurrah! Go here for more information, and go here if you’d like to make some suggestions.
This is a useful database!
Choose a category to get relevant articles, or use the search engine.
Categories
Got something to send the Feminist Philosophers?
Click on 'contact' (at the top of the page), or select our 'contact' category.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
| Walking with Cave Wo… on Gender Assumptions Influence A… | |
| Rebecca Kukla on Nine Men discuss the semantic… | |
| Jason Merchant on Nine Men discuss the semantic… | |
| Anon Grad Student on Using Optical Illusions to Com… | |
| Shyane Siriwardena on Abercrombie and Fitch |
Top Posts
- Nine Men discuss the semantic pragmatic distinction
- Abercrombie and Fitch
- The average face of women across the world
- Constructing the Myth of the Crack Baby
- Wealth inequality in America
- Gendered Conference Campaign
- 6 Women Scientists Who Were Snubbed Due to Sexism
- Using Optical Illusions to Combat Implicit Bias
- Ever lay for two months staring at the ceiling?i
- If men posed like women
Pages
Blogroll
- A Collage of Citations
- Abyss 2 Hope
- Alas, a Blog
- All About My Vagina
- Amptoons
- And Another Thing
- APA Committee on the Status of Women
- Arab Woman Progressive Voice
- Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice
- Atoms Arranged
- Bangladesh From Our View
- Barbara Ehrenreich’s Blog
- Bideshi Blue
- Bitch PhD
- Bite-Sized Subversions
- Black Looks
- Blogging For America
- Border Thinking
- Broadsheet
- cardiff feminist network
- Carnival of Feminists
- Certain Doubts
- Collegium of Black Women Philosophers
- Colored Demos
- Composite
- Condomologist
- Conservatory Girl
- crooked timber
- Cruella Blog
- Diary of an Anxious Black Woman
- Disabled Philosophers
- diversity@spp
- Dolly Mix
- Echidne of the Snakes
- Engage: Conversations in Philosophy
- Engender
- Experimental Philosophy
- F Watch
- F-Words
- Female Science Professor
- Feminist Aesthetics
- Feminist Allies
- Feminist Law Professors
- Feminist Mormon Housewives
- Feminist Philosophers
- Feminist Response in Disability Activisim
- Feministe
- Feministing
- Feminocracy
- Fit, Feminist, and (almost) Fifty
- Florida Philosophy Student Blog
- Geek Feminism
- Gender, Race and Philosophy
- Genius NZ
- Gone Public
- Halfie
- Hi My Name Is…
- Hook and Eye
- I Blame The Patriarchy
- Irresponsibility
- Jean Kazez
- Just Another Angry Black Muslim Woman?
- Knowledge and Experience
- Language Log
- Law and Letters
- Lemmings
- Lilith Attack
- London Feminists
- London Pro-Feminist Men
- Mad Melancholic Feminista
- Metamorpho-Sis
- Mind the Gap
- Miss Crip Chick
- Ms Magazine Blog
- Ms Magazine Online
- Multiplicative Identity
- Muslimah Media Watch
- My Fault, I'm Female
- Natalia Antonova
- New APPS: Arts, Politics, Philosophy, Science
- Nine Pearls
- No Cookies For Me
- No Snow Here
- Objectify This
- Oh No a WoC PhD
- On The Issues
- Packaging Girlhood
- Pandagon
- Pandemian
- Pea Soup
- PennyRed
- Philobiblon
- Philosophy, Etc
- Public Reason
- Questioning Transphobia
- Rachel’s Musings
- Racialicious
- Red Jenny
- RH Reality Check
- Rozena Maart
- SAFER
- Sex In The Public Square
- SGRP The Blog
- Shakesville
- Sheffield Fems
- Siris
- Sister Song
- Slap Upside the Head
- SM Feminists
- Social Justice Feminist
- Staff of Ra
- Symposia on Gender, Race, And Philosophy
- The Brooks Blog
- The Curvature
- The F Word
- The Forbidden Sister
- Thoughts Arguments and Rants
- Thus Spake Zuska
- Ultra Violet
- Unapologetically Female
- Unapologetically Female
- Viva La Feminista
- Wages of Ignorance
- What is it like to be a woman in philosophy?
- What Sorts of People
- What We're Doing About What It's Like
- Where's the benefit?
- Women Count
- Women Philosophers

Yeah, except that he picked a pastor to do his invocation at the inauguration who is anti-abortion, supported Prop Hate etc: Rick Warren. You’ve probably seen this already…
At change.org, people are already trying to stop this slap in the face to any progressives. Although, it’s good to know that Warren doesn’t seem to influence Obama’s policies, so maybe this is just a token nod to the religious wrong…
Rachel, I think we should worry about whether a straight man will fully realize than choice and gay marriage are not just some issues that are part of a big political calculation. Recognizing the legitimacy of opponent points of view requires, I think, disregarding the immense problems faced by women and gays.
Now, that doesn’t mean one can’t work with an opponent, but really having RW give the invocation is too worrying.
And I was just thinking that it would be fun to watch the inauguration on TV. Hmmmmmm. Maybe not now.
JJ, you write: ” I think we should worry about whether a straight man will fully realize than choice and gay marriage are not just some issues that are part of a big political calculation. ” I think we should worry about whether *Obama* fully realises this, because evidence suggests that perhaps he doesn’t. But plenty of straight men do fully appreciate this. And plenty of Log Cabin gay people and plenty of women don’t.
Jender, when I read your response, I thought “O dear! I shouldn’t have generalized so.” But on reflection I do think there is a general point; it is at some level of generality the same as the one that leads one to worry about whether, e.g., a male hiring committee will be able to fairly evaluate women candidates. Some presumably do evaluate fairly, and adding in some women may not help in fact. Still, there is a worry one should have, and safeguards a wise person might ask for.
Given there is a general point to be make, what supports the generality? Is there something like standpoint epistemology that we might bring in? Or is it really a matter of empirical evidence? And maybe it isn’t one thing in all cases.
It was no surprise to see on a number of TV shows last night that no straight guy interviewed seemed to understand the negative reactions.
And, thanks, Jender, for questioning the statement, which I think now looks more questionable than what I thought I intended. Of course, you might find my explanation less exonerating.