Feminist Philosophers

News feminist philosophers can use

More anti-immigration laws in France July 31, 2010

Filed under: immigration — Jender @ 8:22 pm

From Reel Aesthete:

[1.] Two days ago, Sarkozy ordered the expulsion of Gypsies living in France illegally, saying their camps should be “systematically evacuated.” That order came after police clashed this month with Roma in the Loire Valley following the shooting death of a youth fleeing police. The pronouncement caused special outrage because Sarkozy singled out a particular ethnic group in a country official that’s official blind to ethnic origins…

[2.] Sarkozy traveled to Grenoble Friday for the induction ceremony of a new prefect, Eric Le Douaron, and used the occasion to announce a new get-tough approach to delinquency that notably hits hard on immigrants who disobey the law. “French nationality should be earned. One must know how to be worthy of it,” the president said. French nationality should be revoked “from any person of foreign origin who voluntarily threatens the life of a police officer” or other public authority, he said.

And that’s on top of the Burka Ban.

For more, see here.

 

Heard the one about the German breast-oggling study? July 31, 2010

Filed under: science — Monkey @ 10:31 am

No? Well where have you been for the past ten years, since that’s how long the story seems to have been circulating. It’s now resurfaced on this website. In short, the story claims that a German research team led by Dr. Karen Weatherby have discovered that staring at a woman’s breasts increases a man’s life span, and is pretty much the same as doing aerobic exercise. The study was allegedly published in the New England Journal of Medicine. But surprise, surprise, no such article was published in the journal. Nor do there appear to be any entries on medical article databases for Weatherby. The only source for the story seems to be this tabloid news story, where the research is credited to a Dr. Franz Epping. He doesn’t appear in the New England Journal of Medicine, or on any other medical article databases either. You can read more about the hoax here. Thanks to J-Bro.

 

Do they actually know what ‘sweatshop’ means? July 31, 2010

Filed under: academia — Jender @ 10:09 am

Everyone’s been posting this on FB, and seeming to like it, but I’m really annoyed by it. There are genuine and serious problems with academic life that deserve serious discussion and even outrage. But this is not a description of a sweatshop:

Mr. Donoghue, the associate professor of English at Ohio State, says faculty life changed there three years ago, when professors saw a one-course reduction in their teaching load—to four per year. That’s when faculty members started clustering their teaching on Mondays and Wednesdays or Tuesdays and Thursdays. “It used to be the whole faculty was in the building, running into each other, having lots of conversations,” he recalls of the years when faculty members taught five courses a year. “Now the Monday/Wednesday people never see the Tuesday/Thursday people.”

When I saw the title, I thought it would focus on adjunct faculty, who often have huge workloads, no time for research, no job security, and no benefits. But they were mentioned only in passing. Instead, the focus was on the plight of those at top research universities, who complain about having to go to too many international conferences and not having enough time for leisurely lunches. There *are* problems at the research universities, and this commenter,mlisaacs, actually does a nice job of explaining one of them:

The increase in administrative loads is the direct result of the loss of full time professorships. With 70% adjuncts nationally, that leaves all of the administrative work on the backs of 30% of the faculty. I am not referring to the administrative roles of Deans and Chairs but rather all of those things that are related to the academic programs, advising students, serving on committees, governing bodies such as university senates, search committees etc. Enormous amounts of time must be spent writing reports, preparing for meetings, arranging meetings, and sitting in meetings. There used to be a much larger population to share these duties. To maintain any sort of standard, and continue to believe in what one does, most full time professors must work 7 days per week. Burn out is common. Add on to this that most students are really working people who are trying to be students, and it is easy to see that the academic environment leaves very little time for discussion, exploration, sharing, or collective learning.

If only they’d mlisaacs had written the article. There are real problems. But the article sounds like a bunch of highly privileged people at the top of the academic food chain whingeing about the fact that their lives aren’t insanely privileged in quite the same ways any more.* That does a disservice to the cause.

*Not everyone in the article is like this. And, in fact, the pressure to go to lots of international conferences is a real problem. But it ain’t a sweatshop, and it needs to be presented as part of a more intelligent analysis, like that by mlisaacs.

 

Ways for women to be immodest July 30, 2010

Filed under: appearance,J-Bro's Finds,religion — Jender @ 7:56 pm

according to some Christian dudes who were surveyed:

Stretch
Bend over to pick something up
Wear a bag with the strap across your chest
Wear a shirt with a message on the front
Allow your breasts to bounce
Wear tights with designs
Wear shirts with chest pockets
Wear jeans with decorative stitching on the rear

I never knew that I was so sexy. But I want more. I’m gonna go get me some pocket shirts, now that I know they’re hot. (Will pocket protectors make them even hotter?)

Jezebel rightly draws out a serious point from this:

This is a great deal of self-monitoring for girls. Not just when they shop, but when they get dressed, and all day as they move, and with constant re-evaluation of their clothes and how they fit. But, the rationale is, they must be vigilant and obey these rules in order to protect guys from the power of all bodies (both their own sexiness, and men’s biological response to it). Guys are burdened with lust, they insist.

Thanks, J-Bro!

 

Women in Philosophy: Stuff to read! July 30, 2010

Filed under: women in philosophy — Jender @ 11:42 am

I should have known about this before, but somehow I missed it. Probably you didn’t, but just in case…

The APA Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy, Spring 2009 contains SIX fabulous articles on the under-representation of women in philosophy.

MIRIAM SOLOMON AND JOHN CLARKE , “CSW Jobs for Philosophers Employment Study”
KATHRYN J. NORLOCK , “Love to Count: Arguments for Inaccurately Measuring the Proportion of Philosophers Who Are Women”
JANET A. KOURANY , “Why Are Women Only 21% of Philosophy?: Introduction to the Panel Presentations”
ELIZABETH K. MINNICH , “Women in Philosophy: 21% of What?”
SHARON CRASNOW , “What Do the Numbers Mean?”
ABIGAIL J. STEWART , “What Might Be Learned from Recent Efforts in the Natural Sciences?”

And the Fall 2009 Newsletter contains FIVE excellent articles on strategies to help women in philosophy:

ROBIN S. DILLON , “Strategizing Changes in the Culture and Ideology of Philosophy: An Introduction”
ANN GARRY , “What is on Women Philosophers’ Minds?”
ALICE MACLACHLAN
“Drafting Peer Support: The Promise and Perils of an Online Draft Exchange”
SHARON CRASNOW
“Women in the Profession: The Persistence of Absence”
SOPHIA ISAKO WONG AND LISA CASSIDY
“Sharing Strategies for Succeeding as a Feminist Philosopher”

Happy reading!!

 

Heartwarming line of the day July 30, 2010

Filed under: glbt — Jender @ 9:42 am

“Well, they should just give you rings. Marriage is easy to understand. Welcome home.”

The full story is here. (Thanks, Kitchen-chick!)

 

Controversial statement of the day July 30, 2010

Filed under: autonomy,maternity,medicine — Jender @ 9:33 am

“Pregnant women have the same rights as other adults.”

Once more, this rather plausible claim is under fire.

 

Jane Austen’s Fight Club July 29, 2010

Filed under: Uncategorized — Jender @ 10:58 am

via the F-Word.

 

Violent men and nurturing women? July 28, 2010

Filed under: gender — Monkey @ 6:15 pm

I will never forget one of the first things we had to read in the first feminism class I took. It was an argument claiming that women should do all the childcare, because men are too selfish and warlike to look after children. Just one of the daft things people have said to explain why we shouldn’t be allowed to work or leave the house. But the picture of men as violent meat-heads, and women as nurturing and peaceful is firmly lodged in many heads. The recent news that women were more greatly involved in the Nazi holocaust than previously thought, has thus come as a surprise to many. You can read more about it here – but be warned: as one might expect, it’s not a happy read.

EDITED TO ADD: It occurred to me that this post might need a bit more commentary. Especially in light of some of the research on domestic violence statistics that has been linked to by commentators. The idea that men are violent and women are nurturing abounds in the minds of many people – feminists, anti-feminists, and feminist-neutral types alike. (It’s not just feminist doctrine, as many writers discussing the issue would have us believe.) My hunch is that we should reject this view, since (i) it’s not at all clear that it’s true, and (ii) it leads to various types of gender injustice, affecting both men and women (and no doubt also those who identify as neither). As I implied at the beginning of this post, it’s been used to justify restricting women’s role to childcarer, and by extension, homemaker. Whilst I’ll fight for women to be able to choose to take up these roles, I’ll also fight for women to have more choices available to them. Correlatively, it’s been used to deny men – or at the very least make it more difficult – the choice of being childcarer and/or homemaker. And I’ll fight for men to have these choices available to them too. It also makes it more dificult for the victims of female domestic violence – whether these be men, lesbian partners, children, and so on. Clearly, these people need to receive the same support as victims of male domestic violence. And we can recognise this without in any way belittling the abuse suffered by the female partners of violent men. So you see, the myth – for I think it is one – of violent men and nurturing women – is harmful to all of us. I posted this in the spirit of dismantling the myth.

 

Some good news July 28, 2010

Filed under: Uncategorized — redeyedtreefrog @ 5:36 pm

The number of non-emerita women on the Editorial Board of Political Theory just quintupled, from 1 (Elshtain) to 5 (adding Benhabib, Mansbridge, Rosenblum, Pateman).

The journal’s editor Mary G. Dietz writes: “On behalf of the Editors and Executive Editorial Committee,
I happily announce the appointment of four new members to the journal’s
Editorial Board. In recognition of their distinguished scholarship and influential
contributions to the fields of political theory, politics, and political philosophy,
the journal honors Professors Seyla Benhabib (Yale University), Jane
Mansbridge (Harvard University), Nancy Rosenblum (Harvard University),
and Carole Pateman (University of California Los Angeles). We look forward
to working with them to further the success of Political Theory and offer
them a warm welcome to the Editorial Board.”

The announcement is here.

 

New mothers– beware! July 28, 2010

Filed under: maternity — Jender @ 3:28 pm

Keeping even 1-2 pounds of baby weight is dangerous! But so is losing weight too fast!

Expletives deleted.

 

Talking to children about race July 27, 2010

Filed under: bias,race — Jender @ 8:11 pm

A fascinating article argues that talking to children– even very young children– about race turns out to be absolutely vital to fighting discriminatory attitudes. And it’s important to talk explicitly– “everyone’s equal” doesn’t mean much to a child who hasn’t quite grasped the abstract concept of equality but who has noticed differences in skin colour, that they seem to matter in some way, and also that *they’re not allowed* to talk about this. Well-meaning parents are, understandably, reluctant to talk about race– they don’t want their children to use these categories. But they’re mistaken to think that the children won’t acquire the categories– they’ll acquire them, scarily early, and not in a way that the well-meaning parents want them to.

 

Making Gregorian Chant sell with Lady Gaga July 27, 2010

Filed under: religion,the arts — jj @ 7:46 pm

Early Gregorian Chant is eerily beautiful, and it turns out that the  cloistered nuns at Abbaye de Notre-Dame de l’Annonciation are among the best in the world at singing it.  They’ve recently won a contest for female singers of GC.

So suppose you are Decca Records and you’ve now got a recording contract with the nuns for Gregorian Chant.  Just how are you going to sell it?

Well, as it turns out, you’re part of Universal, which has signed on Lady Gaga.  Lady Gaga and cloistered nuns!   WOW!  As CNN puts it, Lady Gaga and the nuns are label-mates.

To be fair, we don’t know that the company even mentioned the two together. 

 The video below might give you an idea of the beauty of the singing.  (I couldn’t find anywhere to sign up to join the cloister; it does look to  be heavenly.)

And here’s some info from CNN:  Singing Nuns Join Gaga’s Record Label:

The Benedictine sisters have taken a vow of isolation and intend to stay in their convent for the rest of their lives.

As part of an ancient order that dates to the sixth century, the nuns can only communicate to visitors, even family, through a grill, according to Decca. …

“We never sought this, it came looking for us,” said the Reverend Mother Abbess in a statement. “At first we were worried it would affect our cloistered  life, so we asked St. Joseph in prayer. Our prayers were answered, and we thought that this album would be a good thing if it touches people’s lives and  helps them find peace.” …

“When you hear the sound of nuns chanting, it’s like an immediate escape from the challenges, stresses, noise and pace of modern living,” Decca executive Tom Lewis said in a statement. “You’re given a  glimpse of a secret world of peace and calm.”

The group of traditionally self-sufficient nuns includes a plumber, an engineer, an electrician, a silk-weaver and a dental assistant.

You can find posts of ours on Gaga here.

 

Breast ironing July 27, 2010

Filed under: appearance,human rights,rape,violence — Jender @ 1:14 pm

intended to prevent sexual assault in Cameroon. Sigh. (Thanks, Jender-Parents.)

 

Presence! July 26, 2010

Filed under: appearance,human rights — jj @ 11:24 pm

Presence” is the name of a relatively new MIT journal; it’s for “serious investigators of teleoperators and virtual reality.”  Think “Second life” and the like.  It covers topics from physics to philosophy, it says. 

The article in the free issue entitled, “Gender Differences in the Impact of Presentational Factors in Human Character Animation on Decisions in Ethical Dilemmas,” seemed as close to irresistible as they were likely to get.  And it is very interesting, for lots of reasons, including the impact of philosophical and psychological approaches to ethics.  But the paper itself draws one’s attention to one finding.  Here’s the abstract:

Simulated humans in computer interfaces are increasingly taking on roles that were once reserved for real humans. The presentation of simulated humans is affected by their appearance, motion quality, and interactivity. These presentational factors can influence the decisions of those who interact with them. This is of concern to interface designers and users alike, because these decisions often have moral and ethical consequences. However, the impact of presentational factors on decisions in ethical dilemmas has not been explored. This study is intended as a first effort toward filling this gap. In a between-groups experiment, a female character presented participants with an ethical dilemma. The character’s human photorealism and motion quality were varied to generate four stimulus conditions: real human versus computer-generated character × fluid versus jerky movement. The results indicate that the stimulus condition had no significant effect on female participants, while male participants were significantly more likely to rule against the character when her visual appearance was computer generated and her movements were jerky.

Roughly speaking, how human and “natural” you appear affects whether men will side with you in an ethical dilemma.  In fact, the problem was concerned with whether a young women should tell her husband that she has genital herpes.

Does this generalize to real life?  Are men more swayed than women by a woman’s looking whatever counts as proper?   What do you think?  Is it like, duh!?

 

Sexist expectations about men July 26, 2010

Filed under: gender,masculinity — Jender @ 8:10 pm

and why feminists (and everyone else) should care about them:

So I’ve been looking more carefully at the specific ways sexism hurts men. In particular, I’ve been looking at our society’s expectations of men, our very definitions of maleness. I’ve been looking at how rigid and narrow many of these expectations are, creating a razor-thin window of acceptable manly behavior that you’d have to be a professional tightrope walker to navigate. (Which would be a problem, since “professional tightrope walker” is definitely outside the parameters of acceptable manliness.)

Thanks, Frog!

 

A success story July 26, 2010

Filed under: academia,bias — Jender @ 12:45 pm

You have probably heard about Wenneras and Wold’s 1997 Nature article, which showed that women needed to be 2.5 times as productive as men to get grants. A dramatic result, especially since their study was in Sweden, often hailed as the leader in gender equality. The study got a lot of press. A LOT. More recently, however, it’s been getting some bad press, as in this article by John Tierney (discussed by us here). Tierney takes the Wenneras and Wold study to be an unrepresentative fluke, basing this view on recent studies which do in fact seem to show that there is no gender bias in grant-giving.

A few nights ago I was discussing this with Mr Jender, and he pointed out that 13 years is quite a long time, that the Wenneras and Wold study got an enormous amount of attention (he had heard of it independently, and he’s not in academia), and that perhaps procedures had changed. It turns out that Mr Jender was exactly right. What happened is now known as The Wold Effect: new procedures were put in place in response to the Wenneras and Wold results (first released in 1995), and the gender bias was eliminated.

So what is currently being billed as the failure of Wenneras and Wold’s results to hold up should instead be seen as a victory for gender equality and an illustration of the fact that change is possible.

(Many thanks to JJ, Mr Jender and VV.)

 

Milk indoctrination? July 26, 2010

Filed under: health — Monkey @ 12:38 pm

The NCT (that’s National Childbirth Trust, not Nottingham City Transport), has objected to questions appearing in science exams on the grounds that they present biased information about breastfeeding.

The GCSE question presents a label for a fictional packet of infant formula milk, called ‘My Baby Food’ as the basis for a question about calcium carbonate. It then goes on to other issues relating to formula milk. On several counts the information presented on this label is misleading, incorrect, and in contravention of UK regulations. For example, it claims the milk is ‘pure and natural’ and makes claims about the nutritional value of the product which are not permitted in UK advertising.

The question then goes on to put forward several biased arguments, presented as ‘information’, including a claim that without free formula milk babies in the developing world might die of malnutrition. This contradicts research estimating that around 1.45 million children die every year through lack of breastfeeding, mainly as a result of unsafe bottle feeding, as well as the UNICEF and WHO guidance on the risks of formula use in developing countries and in disasters.

Charities working to support mothers who want to breastfeed are also negatively caricatured in the question, in the guise of ‘Mrs I M Right’, founder of fictional organisation ‘Responsible Mothers Are Us’.

Her extreme views are framed by a reference to the fact that she has ‘made a career in ‘goodness’ and is paid from donations given to RMAU by members of the public’. The marking criteria for this paper only judges a student’s ability to interpret and accept the information presented, with no room to critique or dispute the claims.

In another example, an SAT paper used in Key Stage 3 again demonstrates bias towards formula milk over breastmilk, claiming fair comparisons between the two when in fact the information is presented without crucial context.

You can read more here.

 

David Mitchell on Burkas (and tattoos) July 26, 2010

Filed under: appearance,multiculturalism,religion — Jender @ 11:11 am

If Al Franken can become a senator, can’t David Mitchell become PM? Pleeeaase??

Governments and legislatures shouldn’t tell people what they can and can’t wear. By doing so, they would, in every sense, be taking a massive liberty. As long as people aren’t wearing crotchless jeans outside primary schools or deely boppers with attached sparklers on petrol station forecourts, we’ve all got the right to wear exactly what the hell we like and I can barely believe that we’re having this debate…

None of this means I think there’s anything good about wearing a burqa. I think it’s daft. I think any belief system that concludes that half the population should go around constantly covered from head to toe in black cloth, whether out of modesty, humility, tradition or stealth, has a massive flaw in it.

And, while I’m at it, I think that it’s ridiculous to believe in transubstantiation, that considering the Bible to be the literal word of God reduces that supposedly omnipotent being to a muddle-headed maniac and that the Hindu caste system and Roman Catholic rules against contraception could have been invented by Satan. There! Now no one will be able to guess who’s killed me….

There’s altogether too much harping on respect and banning these days. If you can’t respect something, you should ban it. If it’s not banned, you should respect it. Bullshit. There is a huge gulf of toleration between respect and banning. In a free society, people should be allowed to do what they want wherever possible. The loss of liberty incurred by any alternative principle is too high a price to pay to stop people making dicks of themselves. But, if people are using their freedoms to make dicks of themselves, other people should be able to say so.

Full article here.

UPDATE: you can support David Mitchell for PM here.

 

Corrected: A Sunday Cat makes the NY Times: in fact, 2 do July 24, 2010

Filed under: cats — jj @ 11:20 pm

For the article in the  NY Times,  see here.  (Beware, it is somewhat defensive  and dismissive.)

For Maru, who has appeared here several times, check these out.

And the dear little surprised cat, also “discussed”, is here.

Left out: There’s a third Sunday Cat in the article, Iggy, the fearless ipad explorer.

 

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 328 other followers