There isn’t any child abuse. Surely we must keep such people from adopting. How can children thrive in an environment like that?
Subscribe by email
This is a useful database!
Categories
Got something to send the Feminist Philosophers?
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Top Posts
- Philosophy 101 and the underrepresentation of women in philosophy
- McGinn leaving Miami due to improper emails
- What do course evaluations evaluate?
- I Guess We Need to Explicitly Say That Suicide is Not a Fashion Statement
- The average face of women across the world
- Nigella Lawson and Domestic Violence
- If men posed like women
- Shrage in NYT on 'forced fatherhood'
- Support Deric Lostutter
- The Sunday cat reveals an avian crime (two, in fact)
Pages
Blogroll
- A Collage of Citations
- Abyss 2 Hope
- Alas, a Blog
- All About My Vagina
- Amptoons
- And Another Thing
- APA Committee on the Status of Women
- Arab Woman Progressive Voice
- Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice
- Atoms Arranged
- Bangladesh From Our View
- Barbara Ehrenreich’s Blog
- Bideshi Blue
- Bitch PhD
- Bite-Sized Subversions
- Black Looks
- Blogging For America
- Border Thinking
- Broadsheet
- cardiff feminist network
- Carnival of Feminists
- Certain Doubts
- Collegium of Black Women Philosophers
- Colored Demos
- Composite
- Condomologist
- Conservatory Girl
- crooked timber
- Cruella Blog
- Diary of an Anxious Black Woman
- Disabled Philosophers
- diversity@spp
- Dolly Mix
- Echidne of the Snakes
- Engage: Conversations in Philosophy
- Engender
- Experimental Philosophy
- F Watch
- F-Words
- Female Science Professor
- Feminist Aesthetics
- Feminist Allies
- Feminist History of Philosophy
- Feminist Law Professors
- Feminist Mormon Housewives
- Feminist Philosophers
- Feminist Response in Disability Activisim
- Feministe
- Feministing
- Feminocracy
- Fit, Feminist, and (almost) Fifty
- Florida Philosophy Student Blog
- Geek Feminism
- Gender, Race and Philosophy
- Genius NZ
- Gone Public
- Halfie
- Hi My Name Is…
- Hook and Eye
- I Blame The Patriarchy
- Irresponsibility
- Jean Kazez
- Just Another Angry Black Muslim Woman?
- Knowledge and Experience
- Language Log
- Law and Letters
- Lemmings
- Lilith Attack
- London Feminists
- London Pro-Feminist Men
- Mad Melancholic Feminista
- Metamorpho-Sis
- Mind the Gap
- Miss Crip Chick
- Ms Magazine Blog
- Ms Magazine Online
- Multiplicative Identity
- Muslimah Media Watch
- My Fault, I'm Female
- Natalia Antonova
- New APPS: Arts, Politics, Philosophy, Science
- Nine Pearls
- No Cookies For Me
- No Snow Here
- Objectify This
- Oh No a WoC PhD
- On The Issues
- Packaging Girlhood
- Pandagon
- Pandemian
- Pea Soup
- PennyRed
- Philobiblon
- Philosophy, Etc
- Public Reason
- Questioning Transphobia
- Rachel’s Musings
- Racialicious
- Red Jenny
- RH Reality Check
- Rozena Maart
- SAFER
- Sex In The Public Square
- SGRP The Blog
- Shakesville
- Sheffield Fems
- Siris
- Sister Song
- Slap Upside the Head
- SM Feminists
- Social Justice Feminist
- Staff of Ra
- Symposia on Gender, Race, And Philosophy
- The Brooks Blog
- The Curvature
- The F Word
- Thoughts Arguments and Rants
- Thus Spake Zuska
- Ultra Violet
- Unapologetically Female
- Unapologetically Female
- Viva La Feminista
- Wages of Ignorance
- What is it like to be a woman in philosophy?
- What Sorts of People
- What We're Doing About What It's Like
- Where's the benefit?
- Women Count
- Women Philosophers
That’s great news, of course, but I can’t help the thought that it is somehow a bit disturbing that the absence of men around may have led to a 0% rate of child abuse. Is it that being in a heterosexual relationship is somehow more stressful for the parents, leading to more child abuse? Is it that men themselves abuse children more often than woman (probably the case anyway)? Let me be clear that none of this comes out of the article, it’s just my own ruminations, but I don’t like these implications at all, especially the first one. Something to think about, very seriously.
2Catarina: Knowing who do a disproportinate share of “adult” rape and of child sexual abuse (yes, unfortunately, that is people of my gender – males), I’d say it is quite probable that simple absence of potential perpetrators is responsible for the huge part of that difference between all families and lesbian families.
Hi isya, thanks for the comment. It’s depressing though, that statistically, it seems better for children just to say away from men :(
Am I the only one that noticed that this study only studied lesbian parents? They only gathered data on lesbian couples, not heterosexual couples or couples of gay men. There is a certain amount of comparison that can be made to data from other studies, but it needs to be taken with a grain of salt, especially given differing methodologies.
I would particularly like to see a study that collects data on both lesbian and gay men couples before jumping to “it seems better for children just to say away from men”.
Cessen, I completely agree with you that it would be very important to contrast the data gathered here with other groups, in particular couples of gay men. I would be not surprised if the rate of child abuse was lower in groups of male gay couples than in groups of heterosexual couples. For one reason, typically male gay couples have to go though a lot more trouble to become parents, so they are likely to be very positively invested in their role of parents. Nevertheless, there are robust data to the effect that, in the wide majority of cases (and of course, typically in heterosexual couples), men are the perpetrators of child abuse more often than women, as Isya mentioned.
I would assume that many of the lesbian couples in this study are adoptive parents, and my guess would be that the rate of child abuse in general is lower among adoptive parents than among biological parents, just because of the rigorous selection process adoptive parents typically have to go through. Even so, it wouldn’t surprise me if one important reason why the lesbian couples in this study turned out to have _0%_ child abuse is the absence of men.
Dear Ben,
Please take a look at the article first. It is online, you can find it at http://www.nllfs.org/
Why keep guessing when you can check? (In fact, the families were not adoptive.)
My bad.
@Catarina:
Could you link to this data? I would be interested to read them. The only reasonably robust statistics I’ve found myself are here:
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm06/figtab3.htm
Which suggest that the large majority of abuse is committed either by mothers or by both mother and father, rather than by just fathers.
Admittedly, it’s entirely possible that most of the abuse committed by women falls under the “neglect” category (I can’t seem to find a chart on type of abuse by perpetrator’s gender), but without evidence that’s just falling into the “angelic women-on-a-pedestal” trope.
Honestly and truly, I wish to see the data you are talking about. This isn’t intended as an “Oh reeeaaaallly???” challenge or some BS like that.
2Cessen:
Here is a similar Canadian survey:
http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publicat/cisfr-ecirf/index-eng.php
You want Table 4-4(a), p.49.
>> Admittedly, it’s entirely possible that most of the abuse committed by women falls under the “neglect” category
Yes, that is absolutely true, as the table referenced above shows.
(When evaluating the Canadian data, bear in mind that it comes from welfare agencies data. So it is an estimate of what gets reported to such agencies, not of national incidence – e.g., direct reports to police only, not to mention cases which never get reported, are not included. Which means, I would say, the absolute incidence of more serious offences is actually higher.)
Thanks Isya.
Looking at the table, it looks like biological fathers and mothers are actually fairly comparable in rates of physical abuse. With emotional maltreatment, again comparable rates. The only areas with differences are sexual abuse and neglect. In the former case, it’s about 3/4 fathers and 1/4 mothers. In the latter it’s almost (not quite) the reverse of that.
For step mothers and step fathers it gets more interesting, with step fathers committing a lot more abuse in every category. Although step parents make up a small amount of abuse in general compared to bio parents.
And yes, of course the actual rates are going to differ from the reported rates. But it’s somewhat speculative to say by how much, in what direction, and why.
> Admittedly, it’s entirely possible that most of the abuse committed by women falls under the “neglect” category
That’s simply because there are much more bio-parents than step-parents. (The figures are not weighted.)
isya:
I assume you meant to respond to:
“For step mothers and step fathers it gets more interesting, with step fathers committing a lot more abuse in every category. Although step parents make up a small amount of abuse in general compared to bio parents.”
?
In any case, yes, of course. But it is still relevant in terms of how many children are impacted.
Oh yes, I am sorry – a copy-paste mistake.