I found this article by David Frum fascinating. It’s about how and why he has begun to move away from his original libertarian views. I’m fascinated by this because it’s so rare to see a political type openly (and apparently genuinely) discussing how their views changed. (It’s quite common for positions to change– but usually the people in question try to pretend it didn’t happen.) For me, it’s important to read this as an optimistic reminder that– despite appearances– people’s views aren’t forever fixed: there is some hope of changing the minds of those (we take take to be) wrong. It’s also, to be honest, a salutary reminder that our political opponents are (at least sometimes) people who think, and who care, and who revise their views in light of these things. It’s far too easy to forget that at times.
This is a useful database!
Choose a category to get relevant articles, or use the search engine.
Categories
Got something to send the Feminist Philosophers?
Click on 'contact' (at the top of the page), or select our 'contact' category.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
| Heg on The old boys network | |
| Bijan Parsia on Nigella Lawson and Domestic… | |
| Anonymous on Gendered Conference Campa… | |
| beta on Nigella Lawson and Domestic… | |
| Jender on Nigella Lawson and Domestic… |
Top Posts
- Philosophy 101 and the underrepresentation of women in philosophy
- I Guess We Need to Explicitly Say That Suicide is Not a Fashion Statement
- The average face of women across the world
- McGinn leaving Miami due to improper emails
- Nigella Lawson and Domestic Violence
- The old boys network
- What do course evaluations evaluate?
- On Lying about a gendered conference/volume
- A useful rape analogy
- New listserv for philosophers with psychological disabilities
Pages
Blogroll
- A Collage of Citations
- Abyss 2 Hope
- Alas, a Blog
- All About My Vagina
- Amptoons
- And Another Thing
- APA Committee on the Status of Women
- Arab Woman Progressive Voice
- Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice
- Atoms Arranged
- Bangladesh From Our View
- Barbara Ehrenreich’s Blog
- Bideshi Blue
- Bitch PhD
- Bite-Sized Subversions
- Black Looks
- Blogging For America
- Border Thinking
- Broadsheet
- cardiff feminist network
- Carnival of Feminists
- Certain Doubts
- Collegium of Black Women Philosophers
- Colored Demos
- Composite
- Condomologist
- Conservatory Girl
- crooked timber
- Cruella Blog
- Diary of an Anxious Black Woman
- Disabled Philosophers
- diversity@spp
- Dolly Mix
- Echidne of the Snakes
- Engage: Conversations in Philosophy
- Engender
- Experimental Philosophy
- F Watch
- F-Words
- Female Science Professor
- Feminist Aesthetics
- Feminist Allies
- Feminist History of Philosophy
- Feminist Law Professors
- Feminist Mormon Housewives
- Feminist Philosophers
- Feminist Response in Disability Activisim
- Feministe
- Feministing
- Feminocracy
- Fit, Feminist, and (almost) Fifty
- Florida Philosophy Student Blog
- Geek Feminism
- Gender, Race and Philosophy
- Genius NZ
- Gone Public
- Halfie
- Hi My Name Is…
- Hook and Eye
- I Blame The Patriarchy
- Irresponsibility
- Jean Kazez
- Just Another Angry Black Muslim Woman?
- Knowledge and Experience
- Language Log
- Law and Letters
- Lemmings
- Lilith Attack
- London Feminists
- London Pro-Feminist Men
- Mad Melancholic Feminista
- Metamorpho-Sis
- Mind the Gap
- Miss Crip Chick
- Ms Magazine Blog
- Ms Magazine Online
- Multiplicative Identity
- Muslimah Media Watch
- My Fault, I'm Female
- Natalia Antonova
- New APPS: Arts, Politics, Philosophy, Science
- Nine Pearls
- No Cookies For Me
- No Snow Here
- Objectify This
- Oh No a WoC PhD
- On The Issues
- Packaging Girlhood
- Pandagon
- Pandemian
- Pea Soup
- PennyRed
- Philobiblon
- Philosophy, Etc
- Public Reason
- Questioning Transphobia
- Rachel’s Musings
- Racialicious
- Red Jenny
- RH Reality Check
- Rozena Maart
- SAFER
- Sex In The Public Square
- SGRP The Blog
- Shakesville
- Sheffield Fems
- Siris
- Sister Song
- Slap Upside the Head
- SM Feminists
- Social Justice Feminist
- Staff of Ra
- Symposia on Gender, Race, And Philosophy
- The Brooks Blog
- The Curvature
- The F Word
- Thoughts Arguments and Rants
- Thus Spake Zuska
- Ultra Violet
- Unapologetically Female
- Unapologetically Female
- Viva La Feminista
- Wages of Ignorance
- What is it like to be a woman in philosophy?
- What Sorts of People
- What We're Doing About What It's Like
- Where's the benefit?
- Women Count
- Women Philosophers

Reminds me of something I believe was said by Hilary Putnam:
“I make no secret of changing my mind on one or two important issues….I’ve never thought it a virtue to adopt a position and try to get famous as a person who defends that position, like a purveyor of a brand name, like you’re selling cornflakes.”
(Okay, so possibly there are some positions Putnam might have been better off sticking with…)
I agree that it is wonderful to see someone admit that the old way of thinking just failed to fit the facts.
At the same time, I cannot understand how the neo-liberal beliefs can possibly support all of the current republican actions. So I’m still going around mutteriing “bad faith,” “selling out,” and other phrases which indicate a lack of respect for them.
E.g., the idea that a job is the best welfare obviously cannot be true of every age category. So what’s with cutting program for the elderly and the very young? Your family takes care of you, or you can go jump off a bridge? If you exhaust your financial resources in an exceptionally difficult economy, then you and your family can go jump?
Personally, I’m not inclined to regard libertarians as “our” opponents. Setting that aside, I’m a bit concerned by the thought that we might only recognize the humanity and intellect of people who disagree with us once they have changed their minds and now agree with us. I want to leave open the possibility that plenty of people who fully continue to disagree with us are also people who think and care and revise their views in light of evidence – and that this, in fact, may be why they disagree with us.
This bothers me, too. Why do many people believe it’s important to never change your position on anything? I would much prefer that leaders, political and otherwise, consistently evaluate the information available and alter their positions accordingly. But this seems to be the minority position.