Feminist Philosophers

News feminist philosophers can use

A little effort February 16, 2012

Filed under: conferences with lots of women,gendered conference campaign — magicalersatz @ 10:02 pm

There’s a great comment from Ned Markosian buried in the discussion on the Ammonius Foundation thread about how a little bit of outreach or encouragement to female philosophers can go a long way. So to keep it from staying buried, I’m giving it a post all its own:

I think it is worth keeping in mind that it takes only a little bit of outreach effort to ensure that a healthy number of women submit papers to a conference, apply for a grant, etc. The program committee for the Bellingham Summer Philosophy Conference typically sends emails to a select number of women to let them know that we would especially value submissions from them (with no suggestion of special treatment or anything like that), and this seems to work pretty well. We tend to get lots of papers from women, and all the papers are then reviewed by referees who do not know anything about the identities of the authors. Two year’s ago the eventual gender breakdown among accepted authors was 5 men and 4 women; last year it was 3 men and 6 women.

Given that such minimal outreach efforts can generate such results, I think we should all be reluctant to justify ongoing gender imbalances merely by saying that very few women submitted or applied. There is usually more that can be done.

 

More recommended reading: Stereotype Promise

Filed under: Uncategorized — redeyedtreefrog @ 8:26 pm

We’ve talked a bit on this blog about “stereotype threat” but there is also evidence of a phenomena called “stereotype promise.” “Stereotype promise” is the promise of being viewed through the lens of a positive stereotype that leads one to perform in such a way that confirms the positive stereotype, thereby enhancing performance. See more here at Sociological Images.

Do you think white men in our disciple benefit from stereotype promise?

 

Recommended reading: Motherhood, science, and academic careers

Filed under: Uncategorized — redeyedtreefrog @ 7:32 pm

When Scientists Choose Motherhood

A single factor goes a long way in explaining the dearth of women in math-intensive fields. How can we address it?

Wendy M. Williams, Stephen J. Ceci

Thanks Rob.

 

CSW Poster: Call for photos!

Filed under: women in philosophy — Jender @ 7:53 am

The APA Committee on the Status of Women (CSW) is creating posters and other merchandise that will soon be available for purchase at Cafe Press. The poster below is a mock-up of a series of at least three “Philosophy: Got Women?” posters that are currently under construction. Each of the three posters will have new and unique composite photos of women in philosophy. If you know of women philosophers (historical or contemporary) who you think should be included (including yourself!) in these composite photos, please send a high-quality image and corresponding name to apa.csw.mail@gmail.com. [updated to correct email address]

The deadline for submitting names with photos is March 15, 2012.

In addition, check out the new CSW website.

Montage of photos of women philosophers. Reads "Philosophy: Got Women?"

 

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,574 other followers