Feminist Philosophers

News feminist philosophers can use

According to this defense lawyer, there is a very low bar for consent. March 13, 2013

Filed under: rape,sexual assault,Uncategorized — femphil @ 6:28 pm

“Defense lawyers in the coming trial of two high school football players charged with raping a nearly passed-out-drunk 16-year-old girl are expected to argue on the issue of consent.”

Read more here.

 

6 Responses to “According to this defense lawyer, there is a very low bar for consent.”

  1. Matt Drabek Says:

    I see all this discussion about the girl’s drunkenness and mental state, but has there been any discussion at all about whether the boys were drunk? Is it established that they were sober, or at least sober enough to have full memories of the evening and control over themselves? Has there been no discussion at all about their decision-making?

    It’s just so screwed up that all sides are sniping at the issue of whether or not she was able to make decisions and there seems to be nothing at all on what the boys were up to at these parties.

  2. Nemo Says:

    Presumably, whether the person was “nearly passed-out-drunk” is an fact that would be established (or fail to be established) at trial. The way the OP reads implies that the defense lawyers are expected to argue on the issue of consent but stipulate that the person was nearly passed-out-drunk, which falsely makes it seem as though the defense lawyers are necessarily going to make an unreasonable argument.

  3. Kimberly Says:

    I’m sure this is not where you were going, but it reminded me of this piece defending using drunkenness as an excuse for rape: http://goodmenproject.com/guy-talk/id-rather-risk-rape-than-quit-partying/.

    In this case, from the pictures it is very clear that they at least knew they were humiliating her and treating her like a toy. One of the drunk bystanders was filmed making fun of how “raped” she was, so at least some of them knew. Here’s the video (it’s very disturbing): http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/02/steubenville-high-school-joke-rape-targeted-anonymous-video_n_2398479.html

    What we see in this case is the pervasiveness of rape culture: the reluctance to prosecute, the belief that if the girl let herself get drunk, it’s her responsibility for having sex, she’s only claiming rape because she’s embarrassed.

  4. Matt Drabek Says:

    Hi Kimberly. What I had in mind was that the real focus of the case seems like it should be on responsibility rather than consent. Looking at what has been put out there in the media (which is quite a lot), it just seems really obvious that the sexual activity that occurred was non-consensual. At least one person involved (the victim, in this case) was incapacitated enough that she wasn’t able to consent. I understand that the defense lawyers will nitpick at this (and, ultimately, that’s part of their job), but the media and blogs do not have the same constraints and interests as the lawyers.

    I’m disappointed that I haven’t seen any discussion of responsibility in the media. Once such a discussion gets going, the article you link from the Good Men Project would be the right item to post.

  5. John Protevi Says:

    Dave Zirin of The Nation examines the sports and rape culture angle here: http://www.thenation.com/blog/173324/steubenville-and-challenging-rape-culture-sports#

    Zirin adds that a trigger warning is advised.

  6. DavidRLogan Says:

    thanks, Dr. Protevi.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 748 other followers