Feminist Philosophers

News feminist philosophers can use

Query: teaching SM, post-50 Shades February 2, 2014

Filed under: sex,teaching — Jender @ 8:03 pm

I haven’t taught SM in my feminism class since 50 Shades of Grey came out. Back in the pre-Shades era, the whole idea of safe words, etc was clearly news to many (though obviously not all) of my students. I knew what misconceptions I needed to correct. Am I right in suspecting it’s a different ball-game now? What are the new misconceptions to correct? Are there interesting works of philosophy I should be adding to do so?

Since this is the kind of topic where things can get heated, I’d like to ask readers to simply go with my assumption that there is no one feminist view to take on this topic. Ta.

 

11 Responses to “Query: teaching SM, post-50 Shades”

  1. shay Says:

    explain that it’s fiction and not a true reflection of the lifestyle. then move on to the real thing.

  2. Jender Says:

    Yes, I am a lazy and bad academic. I can’t bring myself to read the whole thing to find all the misconceptions.

  3. Scu Says:

    Out of curiosity, what texts do you currently teach on the subject?

  4. philodaria Says:

    I read the Twilight series, and 50 Shades developed out of a Twilight fan fiction series. Since I had so many issues with with it’s origins (Twilight that is, I never read the fan fiction either) fantasizing deeply problematic relationships (e.g., romanticizing stalking, for one) I never read 50 shades. But, a friend pointed this out to me which might be somewhat helpful: http://afeministlooker.wordpress.com/2013/01/06/review-50-shades-of-grey-trilogy/

  5. I would suggest taking a look at the highlights 50 shades of fail at the Pervocracy, as the analysis seems to be tailor made to your query.

  6. Matt Drabek Says:

    You might want to check out some of Clarisse Thorn’s stuff, which has been collected in a couple of books (including one on 50 Shades, if I’m not mistaken, and one called “The S & M Feminist”).

  7. philodaria Says:

    Arbourist, I am laughing so hard at these chapter reviews. It’s fantastic.

  8. Matt Says:

    What are the new misconceptions to correct?
    From my (admitted limited) reading of the first book, it seemed that many people thought that reading a book about S&M needed to be an exercise in it. Surely that’s something to correct!

  9. Like Matt, I’d like to recommend Clarisse Thorn. I’m teaching one piece by her this term, from “The S&M Feminist,” but all pieces are from her blog and she has conveniently highlighted and thematically organized her “greatest hits. http://clarissethorn.com/about/

    The piece I’m using is “The Annotated Safeword,” a dialogue between her and (yes-means-yes blogger) Thomas Macaulay Miller. http://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2010/07/07/the-annotated-safeword/

    Thanks for this discussion!

  10. Debra Jackson Says:

    Although not a new contribution to the discussion, I find Sandra Lee Bartky’s chapter “Feminine Masochism and the Politics of Personal Transformation” (in Femininity and Domination, 1990) as relevant and challenging as ever.

  11. annejjacobson Says:

    Teaching SM? WOW!

    I suppose for the non-cognoscenti one might say “teaching about SM.” Much, much less interesting.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,694 other followers