Feminist Philosophers

News feminist philosophers can use

How to be a talkative ally March 20, 2013

Filed under: women in philosophy — magicalersatz @ 2:52 pm

It’s time for another of our series of “How to be an ally” posts, in which we talk about the complicated issues that face the well-intentioned feminist man doing his best to try to navigate between being totally oblivious and being an overbearing, partronizing ass. (Not that those options are mutually exclusive. But anyway.)

A male colleague of mine recently raised the following issue:

I’ve often heard female philosophers complain that they almost never get asked about their work in informal social situations, whereas their male peers get asked about their work in such situations all the time. I realize that this is a really bad thing, but I’ve never been sure what to do about it, at least as far as my own behavior goes. It’s not that I don’t want to ask my female philosophy friends about their work – I do! But I think there’s too much pressure in philosophy to be seen as constantly wanting to talk about philosophy. And I think that’s bad, because it gives an advantage to people who have a certain kind of single-track mind, who are really quick on their feet, or who just don’t get tired like the rest of us. I also think that these norms put women in a particularly awkward position, simply because they’re more professionally vulnerable. I’ve often heard male peers reply to a question about their work by saying “Actually, I really don’t feel like talking about philosophy right now” or “That’s an interesting question, but can we talk about it later? I’m tired!” For them, saying things like this just isn’t a big deal. So I’m comfortable asking my male friends a philosophy question at the bar after a long day of conferencing, because I’m pretty confident that if they don’t want to talk about it they’ll tell me to shut up. But I worry that it isn’t the same for women. I imagine it’s a much riskier thing for a woman to say “Actually, I’d rather not talk about philosophy right now.” She risks being perceived as less ‘committed’, or less ‘quick’, or whatever else. People will remember stuff like that from women that they’ll just excuse and forget from men. But the net effect, for me, is that I find myself a lot more reluctant to ask my female friends a philosophy question after a talk or a day or conferencing. If I dive in with questions, I worry that I’m being a jerk who can’t talk about anything but philosophy, or who’s harassing someone that’s tired. But I don’t want to start by saying “Hey, can I ask you about philosophy or are your too tired/bored/would rather talk about something else?” In part, that makes me feel like I’m putting her on the spot (especially if a bunch of other people are around), and she may not feel comfortable answering honestly the way my male friends can. But it also feels like the kind of thing that might come across as condescending. So I don’t know what to do! How does one make sure to talk to women about their work while still being sensitive to the social pressure women are under?

This strikes me as a really interesting (and really tricky) question, precisely because it’s one of the places in which two competing aims – parity of treatment for men and women, sensitivity to the differences in the social pressure and social vulnerability faced by women compared to that faced by men – are seemingly at odds. Comments are open in hopes that our lovely and thoughtful readers will – as they so often do – have some insight.

Personally, I reckon there’s got to be a decent way of saying something to the effect of “Hey, are you up for talking about philosophy just now?” that avoids being condescending or on-the-spot-putting. Maybe one way doing it would be to offer alternatives, so the choice isn’t just philosophy or nothing – something like “Hey, are you up for talking about your paper on x right now, or should we talk about how bad the drinks here are/what the hell Prof. McX is wearing/this salacious piece of professional gossip I just heard?”

Ps – I tend to write these ‘ally’ posts at random, as and when male philosophy friends email me agony aunt style. So if you’ve got a great idea for a post along these lines, but you don’t know me (or don’t know you know me) just contact us and suggest it.

 

History of Philosophy, with Gaps March 18, 2013

Filed under: women in philosophy — Jender @ 6:22 pm

You’ll be shocked to know that they’re women-shaped. Do suggest some women for the podcasts, here! (Thanks, S!)

 

Mansplaining Feminism to Sally Haslanger March 17, 2013

Filed under: women in philosophy — jennysaul @ 11:02 am

who is, as always, unbelievably gracious. Read about it all here.

 

Crowdsourcing works by women March 15, 2013

Filed under: women in philosophy — jennysaul @ 8:16 pm

Over at NewAPPS! This particular call is for readings suitable for intro courses. But this may turn out to be a wonderful way to gather readings for a variety of courses.

 

Interview with Silvia Federici March 13, 2013

Filed under: international feminism,women in philosophy,women's studies — Monkey @ 11:19 pm

Interesting interview with Silvia Federici who was in London at the end of last year. Long, but well worth the read.

Silvia Federici is a scholar, teacher, and activist from the radical autonomist feminist Marxist tradition. She is a professor emerita and Teaching Fellow at Hofstra University, where she was a social science professor. She worked as a teacher in Nigeria for many years, is also the co-founder of the Committee for Academic Freedom in Africa, and is a member of the Midnight Notes Collective.

More from wikipedia.

 

“Everyone Can Be a Philosopher”

Filed under: academia,appearance,gender,gender stereotypes,women in philosophy — Lady Day @ 3:25 am

Hey! Wanna feel happy about stuff for a few minutes? Feminist Philosophers reader Sophie Collins sent us the following remarks and image. So very awesome!

I’m a big fan of the blog, as a feminist philosophy undergrad, it’s great to see.

Just wanted to tell you a story that happened in my philosophy class today. I facilitate philosophy classes in primary schools, and today the kids were given the task to draw a symbolic picture which would represent what you need to be like, to be a philosopher. The picture was going to make part of an advert for a different school which needs a philosophy teacher.

Some kids drew speech bubbles, some drew thinking bubbles, some drew them very smartly dressed (because it is a job). Most drew stick people without a gender.

One drew herself, because she is a philosopher.   One drew a guy with a beard, for scratching.

We then brought the best bits of the pictures together to form one picture, for the advert.

I asked if the beard was needed. I said that I am a philosopher,and I don’t have a beard. We discussed it for a bit,and in the end decided to draw a person with pigtails and a beard, and a question mark next to their head to show that it doesn’t matter if you’re a boy or a girl, everyone can be a philosopher.

DSC_0293

 

Attracting female PhD applicants March 12, 2013

Filed under: women in philosophy — magicalersatz @ 8:21 am

A commenter on this post asks: “What advice would you give to get more women to *apply* to one’s program?” I thought I’d open up a new thread for this, in case our readers – as they so often do – have helpful and thoughtful suggestions.

I take it that the context of this question is one in which there is a shortage of women in philosophy for broad and systematic reasons. There is probably not much (or at least not much that’s sane and legal) that an individual department can do to suddenly attract an applicant pool that’s 65% female – though maybe I’m wrong about that. So I take it that the question is something like this: given that women already apply to philosophy grad programs in limited numbers, how can I make sure that as many of them as possible apply to my program? That is, how do I make my program seem as attractive as possible to potential women applicants?

My two cents – but I’m pretty out of my depth here – is this. Start by focusing on actually being a good place for women. Then make sure that you are open and public about the stuff that you do for women.

I’d be really curious to know whether departments who have been making efforts on both counts recently – Rutgers gives a good example here – have seen these efforts translate into greater numbers/percentages of female applicants.

 

Number of women in PhD programs March 11, 2013

Filed under: women in philosophy — magicalersatz @ 11:56 am

Via the Leiter Report, there’s some really interesting data up here on the gender breakdown at some top philosophy PhD programs.

 

Query From a Reader: Dismissive Comments March 10, 2013

Filed under: queries from readers,women in philosophy — jennysaul @ 8:33 pm

A colleague of a reader recently circulated one of my papers on women in philosophy around her department. It’s been my experience that people usually respond well to the empirical data and the non-blamey tone. (Though maybe that’s just how they respond *to me* and they say other things when I’m not there.) Anyway, this time a more senior colleague responded with dismissive mockery. Any thoughts on how to deal with this?

 

Nature on International Women’s Day March 8, 2013

Filed under: academia,women in philosophy — Jender @ 9:32 am

Nature has an excellent special issue for International Women’s Day. And I must admit we are especially chuffed that our advice on avoiding a gendered conference gets a mention in Virginia Valian’s piece (8 experts giving their views). (Thanks, J!)

 

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 749 other followers