Some UK bloggers were writing about this last year, but it’s just coming to US attention. Foreseeing a stressful weekend, I ordered it from Amazon.com last week. Truth be told, I’m feeling much better after a double dip last night.
It’s not fattening and there is no haze or hangover the next day. All there is is a sneaking suspicion one should have been more critical.
The source? It’s “The Amazing Mrs Pritchard,” which is now showing on PBS’s Masterpiece Theater. It’s a silly fantasy in many ways; a very bright and determined manager of a supermarket expresses a few strong political feelings and ends up Prime Minister of England, with many women occupying important positions in the government.
The acting is first rate, and the men are – so far, anyway – scoundrels, except for the occasional sex object. O dear. Very, very much the shoe on the other foot.
Strong criticism is possible. But it strikes me as rather like saying that animals are clearly incapable of effectively replacing humans in the running of a farm. True, but it misses the point of Animal Farm.
The title of this post was borrowed from a comment in an NY Times review. The reviewer also says:
”-“A woman needs a man like a fish needs a-bicycle” kind of feminism that feels as distant and goofy to us now as the “Mad Men” era of sexism it fought to depose.
This view of the series is echoed in a number of feminist comments on it on the web. I’m reflecting on whether the era of 1970’s sexism in philosophy hasn’t renewed itself decade by decade. Are women in other professions now experiencing a professional world so different from that in so many philosophy departments?