Mao offered US 10 Million Women

Apparently, during a trade negotiation in 1973, Mao offered the US 10 million women.

“You know, China is a very poor country,” Mao said, according to a document released by the State Department’s historian office.”We don’t have much. What we have in excess is women. So if you want them we can give a few of those to you, some tens of thousands.” A few minutes later, Mao circled back to the offer. “Do you want our Chinese women?” he asked. “We can give you 10 million.”

Kissinger, characteristically, gave a clear rejection of the appalling offer:

“It is such a novel proposition,” Kissinger replied in his discussion with Mao in Beijing. “We will have to study it.”

Now, it’s not like Mao treated Chinese men well either, but this is a particularly stark example of the commodification of women. (Thanks, Jender-parents!)

 

Let’s all go to Texas…

And proudly declare our possession of *more than 5* vibrators.  Because now we can! And before we couldn’t, without fear of prosecution.  (It would have been assumed that we were dealing, because nobody could need more than 5 for personal use.)  And we can even *call* them what they are.  So can people selling them.  To see some of the lengths folks used to have to go to in order to sell vibrators, watch this wonderful video featuring Molly Ivins.

For more on the many and fascinating ways that vibrators have been conceived of and marketed, see Rachel Maines’s wonderful The Technology of Orgasm.  (Short story: they were perfectly respectable home health aids, used to treat one’s wandering womb by inducing a hysterical paroxysm.  Which wasn’t sexual.  No not at all.)  H/T Feministe.

A Valentine’s gift

Received today from the remarkable artist, Susan Plum.  Don’t miss the links below the image:

Photobucket

Susan Plum’s website has unforgettable images from an exhibition for the women of Juarez:

This exhibition honors the families, particularly the mothers of the 430 young women and children who have been murdered and the 600 who have disappeared in Juarez during the past 13 years. The practice continues. http://www.mujeresdejuarez.org

The families have found little justice in these tragedies.

A Modest Proposal: Mandatory Vasectomies

Reader S. has passed on to me this proposal, from a letter to the editor of the Toledo Blade.  Could be really good for getting some in-class discussion going!

Control men’s bodies as well as women’s

I want to know why it’s viewed as OK for government to control women’s bodies, as proposed by some, and yet we don’t propose that government control men’s bodies. There would be no fertilized eggs without sperm.If it’s OK for the government to tell women that they must carry a fetus to term, whether or not she wants to do so or even if the pregnancy threatens the woman’s life, then why is it not OK for government to tell men that they must have a vasectomy, whether or not they want to do so?Vasectomies control pregnancy and are cheaper and easier than abortions or children. Actually, we could put a great number of issues to rest by controlling the original cause of all pregnancies. We could just nip this thing in the bud.Vasectomies are reputed to be reversible. So, a man could be given a vasectomy when appropriate, at puberty, and then reversed once he and a like-minded female are ready to have children. The government could mark a man’s driver’s license with a special V, so that when asked, a man can identify that he has had the procedure. Of course, vasectomies are not always reversible, but we can hope. Just as we hope that pregnancies work out well for the female, which they don’t always.I thought what was good for the goose was good for the gander. We could start the “V” campaign, V for vasectomies and V for victory over unwanted pregnancies. Men could be pro-V or anti-V, but that really wouldn’t matter as the government would have the control and final say. Let’s hear it for equal opportunity.

Jane Lynam 

Society for Interdisciplinary Feminist Phenomenology

…now has a new website. Here is their announcement:

The recently formed Society for Interdisciplinary Feminist Phenomenology is pleased to announce the launch of our website. SIFP was formed by Professors Bonnie Mann and Beata Stawarska, both faculty members in the Department of Philosophy at the University of Oregon; Dr. Sara Heinämaa, Senior lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Helsinki, Finland, Professor of Women’s Studies at the Centre for Women’s Studies and Gender Research at the University of Oslo, Norway, and International Adviser of SIFP; and Dr. Eva Maria Simms, Professor of Psychology at Duquesne University and the National Adviser of SIFP. Please visit the new website, located here, for more information about the society and our activities, to create a “scholars page,” join our listserve, and more!

SIFP’s activities have been made possible through funding from the University of Oregon’s Center for the Study of Women in Society, the College of Arts and Sciences, and the Department of Philosophy.

Steak and a blow job? No thanks.

In my few months as an ex-pat in America, I’ve been introduced to several new festivals and holidays. My girlfriend brought another to my attention recently, and couldn’t understand why my reaction fell somewhere between unease and dismay. What problem could I possibly have with ‘Steak and a Blow Job Day’?

Well, let’s start with the name, and the implication that the tastes of men can be summarised so. The corollary, as the website makes clear, is the idea that women’s interests can be equally easily rounded up; ‘gifts, flowers… baubles’. Of course, it’s just a name, not an order for how the day’s got to be marked, but names are important.

Now, on the day’s point. It was conceived – and presented to me – as a reciprocal measure for all the expense and attention that should be lavished on one’s dearest on Valentine’s Day. Wonderful. It’s still possible, perhaps, to celebrate Valentine’s Day without endorsing the idea that the festival, and by extension your relationship, is about commercial exchange, in which a man seduces a woman with wealth, and she, the junior partner, yields with sex and food. But that possibility is nullified if you create and celebrate a corresponding festival that formalises the exchange of commodities and reifies the idea of such exchange as the basis of heterosexual ‘partnership’.

Finally, about the people endorsing this day. I could just about laugh it off if they were mostly men, mostly reactionary, mostly middle-aged, mostly rather sad. But instead, my girlfriend proudly described it as an ‘underground’ holiday of which she and her (girl) friends were enthusiastic advocates. ‘Underground’, I suppose, connotes young, hip, liberal, free-thinking. If this is indicative of how (American) women who would describe themselves as such think about their relationships, we return to a depressingly pervasive thought; feminism still has a long way to go.

Women in Philosophy

For women the philosophy profession has real problems, starting with problems of exclusion.  Perhaps foolishly optimistically, I’ve thought that making the problem more visible would help. 

And I’ll confess upfront:  My idea of fun at an APA would be to combine the style of a Cristo and Jeanne Claude project with a philosophical version of the Guerrilla’s Girls statement.  Not that anyone at an APA meeting would notice, so a bunch of us might have to put on some sort of  costume (from “Cats!”) and perhaps act a bit menacing in the hall ways.

OK, maybe not that.  Still, see  if you can get some ideas from this:

And for Christo and Jeanne Claude:

see the Reichstag wrapped in silver cloth:

Or The Gates in Central Park:

When maths and traditionally feminine crafts meet

You can get something great:

In 1997 Cornell University mathematician Daina Taimina finally worked out how to make a physical model of hyperbolic space that allows us to feel, and to tactilely explore, the properties of this unique geometry. The method she used was crochet.Dr Taimina’s inspiration was based on a suggestion that had been put forward in the 1970’s by the geometer William Thurston (also now at Cornell). Noting that one of the qualities of hyperbolic space is that as you move away from a point the space around it expands exponentially, Thurston designed a paper model made up of thin cresent-shaped annuli taped together. But Thurston’s model is difficult to make, hard to handle, and inherently fragile. Taimina intuited that the essence of this construction could be implemented with knitting or crochet simply by increasing the number of stitches in each row. As you increase, the surface naturally begins to ruffle and crenellate. Taimina, who grew up in Latvia with a childhood steeped in feminine handicrafts, immediately set about making a model. At first she tried knitting – and you can indeed knit hyperbolic surfaces – but the large number of stitches on the needles quickly becomes unmanageable and Taimina realized that crochet offered the better approach.

crochet_02.jpg

The beauty of Taimina’s method is that many of the intrinsic properties of hyperbolic space now become visible to the eye and can be directly experienced by playing with the models. Geodesics – or straight lines – on the hyperbolic surface can be sewn onto the crochet texture for easy examination. Through the yellow lines in the model below look curved, folding along them demonstrably produces a clean straight line.

crochet_03.jpg

For more, go here. (Thanks, Jender-Parents!)