Some cats in Spain have it good. This cat door was built over 100 years ago, and is still being used, even though it is now attached to an abandoned building. Yes, those are balconies– though not ones that would actually hold cats. It’s dedicated to two cats who apparently were louder than any other cats. (The rectangular bit in the lower right is a plaque with dedication.)
Female Science Professor has posted some useful answers to those awful questions and comments an academic woman easily gets. My favorite response is to the question, “So they had to hire a woman…?” Of the answers offered, this one gets my vote:
Answer 3: Yes, they finally realized they had hired enough mediocre men.
Some of the questions assume you are in a heterosexual relationship. No one will be surprised, I expect, that we/I’ve used these:
Question (said to male person): Who takes care of your kids when your wife travels?
Answer: The cats.
Question (said to married/partnered female person): Who takes care of your kids when you travel?
Answer: The cats.
Question (said to academic couple): Which of you is the trailing spouse?
Answer: Our cat.
Our friend, Eric Switzgebel, has posted some revealing figures about women in philosophy. In studying philosophers’ voting patters, he and his collaborator gathered a lot of data about philosophers. Though the sample was just 5 states, they covered them very thoroughly. In addition, there were age data for philosophers in 4 states.
They’ve reused the figures to look at men’s and women’s comparative progress in the profession. Switzgebel concludes that the record shows women move through the profession more slowly than men.
Another dismal fact emerges; the comparative perceptage of non-TT positions women occupy. For those young women with birth dates ranging from 1970-1979, 36% are in non-TT positions! That’s compared with 13% of the guys.
Switzgebel mentions an obvious factor which may slow women’s progress: marriage and/or children. In addition, women are more often “the trailing spouse” in the sciences, and this might well apply in philosophy also. Of course, we need to be careful not to conclude that sexism isn’t operating. Not only may it still be at work at a number of junctures, including what makes a male partner a hotter property on the market, but also there’s the institutional sexism of the university and college structures that are still geared to male biological lives more than female.
So thanks, Eric! For the study!
In teaching about abortion, one position the students *here* find so appalling as to be barely worth discussing is the idea of a male veto for abortion decisions. But in Ohio, a bill mandating this is being considered. Planned Parenthood of Ohio writes:
One year ago, State Rep. John Adams (R-Sidney) introduced one of the most outrageous pieces of legislation we have ever seen. House Bill 287 would require a woman to have the written informed consent of the prospective father of her fetus before being allowed to have an abortion.
That’s right… If the man says “No,” there will be no abortion.Period!
This bill may actually be scheduled for hearings in the coming weeks. To raise awareness about this offensive bill, Planned Parenthood Affiliates of Ohio is partnering with ProgressOhio, an outreach organization that builds awareness of legislative issues.
You’re not going to believe this… HB 287 also requires that, if the identity of the prospective
father is unknown, a paternity test must be performed to determine his identity so that his consent could be obtained prior to performing the abortion.
What is left unsaid is that prenatal paternity testing: cannot be performed until at least the 10th week of pregnancy, near the end of the first trimester; is an invasive procedure using a long needle through the abdomen to collect fetal cells; is expensive – up to $2,000 per test;
and poses a potential medical risk. The practical effect of the paternity test requirement would
prevent some women from obtaining an abortion during the first trimester.
Once paternity is established, if the man says “No,” there will be no abortion.
Even worse if… If the pregnancy resulted from rape, the woman would be required
to provide a police report proving it. If the pregnancy resulted from incest, the woman would be
required to provide a paternity test or a police report. If the woman chooses not to identify the prospective father (perhaps out of fear for her own physical well-being), her only recourse would be to continue the pregnancy against her wishes or have an illegal abortion, a first degree misdemeanor.
To sign a petition against it, go here. (Thanks, Jender-Parents!)