Feminist Philosophers

News feminist philosophers can use

“Some were meant for the Sea” July 6, 2011

Filed under: the arts — jj @ 9:32 pm

The title is the name of an album by Tiny Ruins.  She’s from New Zealand, and her voice is good to hear on a summer evening.  Tom Ravenscroft of the New Statesmen says the album is of vast beauty.

Here’s the song ‘The Cat in the Hallway:’

 

Leading Change

Filed under: academia,critical thinking,science,women in philosophy — jj @ 3:19 pm

Many people writing and reading this blog are interested in change.  We think both on smaller and on larger scales, from the injustices in our profession to those in our society and onto those afffecting subordinated people around the world.

I am wondering how many of us look to the business management literature for some ideas about what can be done, and what we are not doing yet.  When I offered to head up a scientific research group, and later when I was heading of the faculty organization, I reckoned I had better read a lot to get some ideas of what worked and what didn’t work.

I think I got a lot of help.  For example, one model of leadership – you pick your favorite group and meet behind closed doors to decide on initiatives which you present to the others – is ubiquitous in academia.  It is, however, not a good model for changing a culture.  John Kotter, at Harvard, was one of the leaders in enabling people to see how one should not do that, to put it roughly, and he drew up alternative models of change effective leadership styles.

I was thinking of this today since a newsletter from a management consultancy firm came into my mailbox.  It was selling a book, of course.  But the book was about the difficulty of change, how there is always great resistence to change, and about how to work with that, how to absorb the resisters into partnerships.  Sounds like what we want to do.

One other figure in the business management field I want to mention is Rosabeth Kantor.  I first encountered her as someone to read when I took a summer course for feminism for faculty at Rutgers in the 1980′s.  One of her leading thoughts, it seemed to me then, was how being outsiders in organizations (e.g., the token person of color, disabled person, etc) could get your head screwed up and turn you into someone you didn’t really want to be.  (That’s my take on her take, and not exactly what she said.)

One thing that I used to read regularly was the Harvard Business School Newsletter.  It’s fun to come to understand more fully why things your university is doing are pointless or counterproductive.  Looking for it today I found two interesting things.  One is an interview with Kantor:

http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/6295.html

and the other I found when I googled “Harvard Business School letter.”  I discovered a lot of templates for letters of recommendation.  Not bad ones at all.

So, should we all rush out and get some management books?  If not, why not in some way look through the literature?

Have a look at the Kantor interview.  What do you think?

 

 

 

Biases about gay and lesbian professors

Filed under: bias,sexual orientation,teaching — Jender @ 3:07 pm

In a new study published in The Journal of Applied Social Psychology, psychologists Kristin J. Anderson and Melinda Kanner explored undergraduate students’ evaluations of lesbian, gay, and heterosexual professors of a hypothetical course, Psychology of Human Sexuality. They provided students with a syllabus of the course, providing biographical information about the hypothetical professor including political ideology, gender, and sexual identity. The researchers also varied whether the syllabus had typographical errors. They examined whether students would differ in their evaluations of the lesbian/gay and heterosexual professors, especially in terms of whether the professor was politically biased.

The researchers found that lesbian and gay professors were viewed as politically biased, while heterosexual professors with the exact same syllabus were viewed as objective. On average, lesbian/gay professors were rated more harshly, and students pointed to political bias and typographical errors (typos) on the syllabus as their main reason for the negative evaluation. However, heterosexual professors were not negatively evaluated for political bias and typographical errors.

For more, go here.

(Thanks, Rob!)

 

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,323 other followers