3 thoughts on “Last chance for comments on DSM-5

  1. No need for bravery in looking at the gender dysmorphia entry, imho. I can come up with criticisms – for instance the language of gender is overly and unnecessarily binary throughout. But I think the DSM folks deserve credit for having responded thoughtfully to criticism. I think it’s built into the nature of a classificatory diagnosis manual like this, with all the social power that comes with it, that capturing ‘conditions’ that go to the heart of complex identities will be next to impossible to do perfectly. But I think this is a remarkably progressive and careful entry, all things considered.

  2. I think Rebecca’s comments are fair. There are plenty of things to criticize in the new DSM, but the folks who are working on it deserve to be commended for opening it up to comments and responding to them. The folks working on the paraphilias were particularly open to the communities sub-communities with whom they’ve had rocky relationships in the past.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s