The real history of the 2nd amendment

UPDATE: Apparently this is not true. (Thanks, HL!)

ANOTHER UPDATE: Or maybe it is true. (See below, in comments.) Keep your views and links coming; I’m learning a lot!

Its purpose was to preserve slavery. (Stick that in your originalist interpretation.)

The real reason the Second Amendment was ratified, and why it says “State” instead of “Country” (the Framers knew the difference – see the 10th Amendment), was to preserve the slave patrol militias in the southern states, which was necessary to get Virginia’s vote. Founders Patrick Henry, George Mason, and James Madison were totally clear on that . . . and we all should be too.

10 thoughts on “The real history of the 2nd amendment

  1. Ummm…I’m not sure the correction is correct! Hartmann is writing about the ratification of the 2nd Amendment (1791) and Finkelman’s correction is about ratification of the Constitution (1788). While Finkelman wiggles by when he writes that “Hartmann implies that the Second Amendment was adopted (or at least written) to get Virginia’s “vote” for ratification of the Constitution…” it’s not clear to me that Hartmann does imply ratification of the Constitution.

  2. Bogus’s first article contains the claim, “including debates [about the topic of the 2nd amendment] between James Madison and George Mason and Patrick Henry at the Constitutional Ratifying Convention in Richmond, Virginia in June 1788”.

    Were there such debates? That looks to me like something a historian could verify fairly easily. And it seems, as far as I can tell, crucial to the argument that at least the concerns of the 2nd amendment were around in 1788, if the argument about VA is to go through.

  3. A quick googling leads one to the militia clause in the constitution which was debated in 1788. It appears that the clause does deal with the question of whether the right to bear arms is a collective right (to apply to certain groups) or an individual right.

Comments are closed.