This is another one of those cases where it’s good that the topic is getting attention, even if the article isn’t ideal. There was so much I said in the interview that didn’t come through, and so many bits pulled out without proper context or argument being given. On the other hand, I am glad that it does mention implicit bias and sexual harassment and doesn’t spend any time entertaining claims of innate gender differences, talking to people who think there’s no problem, or anything like that. One big lesson learned: epistemic humility comes across as befuddlement to journalists. Sigh. Anyway, it’s here.