From Gabriele Contessa — see his blog for the details as to how to submit:
New Feature/Call for Proposals: The Philosophy Spotlight
… It will consist in a post by a philosopher, X, recommending a paper by another philosopher, Y, and explaining briefly the content of the paper and why they think the paper should be widely read.The only necessary conditions are:
- X is distinct from Y (no self-nominations and no anonymous nominations, sorry!).
- Y does not work for a Leiterific department (I hate to have to do so but we are going to rely on the latest PGR ranking to determine whether a department is Leiterific, On this interpretation, D is not a Leiterific Department iff D does not appear on the general “international” top-50 list of the latest PGR).
- Y has agreed for his/her paper to appear on The Philosopher’s Spotlight.
Some further considerations you might want to keep in mind in choosing a paper to nominate (none of them amounts to a necessary condition; nor does their disjunction).
- Y’s paper is not published in a top journal.
- Y is a philosopher who belongs to an underrepresented group in philosophy (since this is not a necessary criterion, I’m not going to specify what I mean).
- Y’s paper is of broad philosophical interest.
- … (I might keep adding optional criteria here. Please feel free to suggest additional optional criteria in the comments!)
Intriguing! (But link goes to the wrong place.)
Fixed, and thanks for the alert!
Thanks for linking to the post, Kate!
Great idea!