John Oliver on abortion laws

Perfect.

 

CFA: Philosophy of ‘Race’ and Racism, University of Oxford, 27-29 June 2016

Philosophy of ‘Race’ and Racism

University of Oxford, 27-29 June 2016

Keynote Speakers: Nathaniel Adam Tobias Coleman, Michael McEachrane, Vanessa Wills

W. E. B. Du Bois famously wrote that “the problem of the twentieth century is the problem of the color-line”. All of us now are well into the twenty-first century, and for contemporary Europeans, Du Bois’ remarks may appear distant a second time over: off his spelling of ‘color’ we can read his Americanness. And yet the problem Du Bois’ addresses here is (despite his spellings) our problem too, on either side of the Atlantic, and beyond. Although his remarks on the “color-line” are most commonly associated with The Souls of Black Folkand its concern with black life in the United States, he in fact first offered them to a London audience at the first Pan-African Conference, in a speech entitled “To the nations of the World”.  As he puts it here, “the problem of the color-line” is the question as to how far differences of race … will hereafter be made the basis of denying to over half the world the right of sharing to their utmost ability the opportunities and privileges of modern civilization”. Hence, Du Bois took this problem to be not only of local, but, first and foremost, of global relevance and thus to affect most of those who are non-white. In different locations, however, the manifestations of this problem–that is, the contours of racial categories, the social meaning associated with those categories, and the pressing issues of racial injustice–may nevertheless be markedly different. In light of this, there is something of a lacuna in the emerging literature on the  historically neglected philosophy of ‘race’ which has seen a flowering of interest in the last twenty years: much of it assumes, either tacitly or explicitly, an US-American audience, and addresses the phenomena of race and racism primarily salient to a distinctively US-American context. In order to help close this lacuna, this conference aims to widen the conversation beyond the context of the US. We thus seek both to increase our understanding of race and racism in different global contexts, and to asses what the contextual variability of race and racism tells us about these phenomena.

We invite abstracts of 300-500 words for 30 minute papers addressing race and/or racism. Priority will be given to papers that explore these phenomena in global contexts other than the US, or that explore the implications of their contextual variability. We also particularly welcome work that engages with legacies of European colonialism. Possible topics include the nature of racial oppression/domination and/or structural injustice, the intersection of racism with other forms of oppression (e.g. misogyny, heterosexism, transphobia, ableism), the connections between race in the academy and activist movements, the meta-philosophical implications of accounting for race or racism, the metaphysics of race, racial ideology and epistemologies of ignorance, and the requirements of racial justice.

Submissions should be made via easychair by the 23rd of April. We will let our decision be known by the 1st of May. For details about the accessibility of the conference location, see the ‘Access’ section of our website.

CFP: Reconsidering the Philosophical Canon, Duquesne University, April 23rd 2016

Reconsidering the Philosophical Canon

Duquesne University

April 23, 2016

Keynote Speaker: Penelope Deutscher, Professor of Philosophy, Northwestern University

Duquesne Women in Philosophy (D-WiP) invite philosophical papers on the question of reconsidering the philosophical canon. Given the recent discussions on the limitations of the philosophical canon, we aim to facilitate a discussion on the future directions of philosophy, how we may reconsider our reading of the history of philosophy and the question of canonicity. Papers are welcome from historical perspectives as well as from within contemporary philosophical discourse. We invite abstract submissions of maximum 500 words to dwipcontact@gmail.com by March 7, 2016. Allotted presentation time will be 20 minutes.

Possible areas of exploration include:

• women in the history of philosophy
• philosophy done from minority perspective in the history of philosophy
• intersection of race and gender in the history of philosophy
• attempts in contemporary philosophy of reformulating the North American and European philosophical canon
• historical or critical approaches to the modernity in terms of canonization of philosophical
• feminist writings on the philosophical canon
• problems of race and racism in Modern philosophy