A Feinberg School of Medicine student is suing Northwestern under Title IX saying the school responded with “deliberate indifference” after he reported he was sexually harassed by a professor.
A federal judge ruled last week that the student can move forward with his Title IX lawsuit against the University. His lawyer confirmed Friday that he will do so.
Judge Sara L. Ellis ruled Aug. 6 that the medical student can make his case that the University retaliated against him and did not respond as rapidly or as strongly to his grievances as it has to similar complaints filed by female students. Ellis dismissed the student’s allegation that the University responded inadequately to his sexual harassment complaint.
The student says a Feinberg microbiology and pathology professor sexually harassed him and later retaliated against him after the student rejected his advances by assigning him poor grades, opposing his application to a fellowship and directing others to discontinue a promised scholarship, according to the suit.
Another Title IX lawsuit against Northwestern is proceeding August 15, 2015
The picture to the left is of Kiran Gandhi, a drummer for M.I.A., who ran the recent London Marathon after having started her period. She did not use a tampon. One result is the stain between her legs. Another is a lot of outrage and accusations. Her account of her motives is on her blog.
There are a lot of issues that surround menstruation. One set of issues she wants addressed more widely is the shame many women feel about menstruating. Another is the fact that many women in the world do not have access to products that can in some way contain the blood. She also thought she would be compromising her health choices in order to make people more comfortable, which doesn’t sound like a great idea.
So what do you think? For my own sake I have the uneasy feeling as I put this post up that the sky might come crashing down on my head.
Sex, Gender, and Survey Practices August 13, 2015
There’s a great new post up over at SWS’s Gender and Society page describing a recent study of the deployment of sex and gender categories in U.S. surveys. The results are troubling and illuminating. Here’s a taste:
One surprising finding is that when these surveys are conducted face-to-face or by telephone Americans are not asked to self-identify their sex or gender at all. Instead, the survey interviewer determines the category for the people they interview. The box for “male” or “female” gets checked off based on an unstated set of criteria that could include anything from their name, their voice, their dress or physical appearance, or their relationship to other people in their household. Occasionally, interviewers are instructed to ask a direct question, but only if the person’s sex or gender “is not obvious.” Even then, it is often presumed that asking someone this question will be awkward, likely because of the belief that a person’s sex or gender should be obvious.
clinton, Mind-reading and attributions of racism July 25, 2015
There’s a kind of mind-reading that seems to me to be very prevalent in the US. It often goes so far as to assume that someone other than X is better able to tell what X thinks than X is. This not a harmless assumption, and it is built on a false assumption about our access to other minds. In fact, our mind-reading is prone to a lot of mistakes once we get beyond the very simple tests used on 4 year olds in psychology.
Most recently Hilary Clinton is being victimized by mind-reading. She said:
Race remains a deep fault line in America. Millions of people of color still experience racism in their everyday lives.
Here are some facts.
Let’s be honest: For a lot of well-meaning, open-minded white people, the sight of a young Black man in a hoodie still evokes a twinge of fear. And news reports about poverty and crime and discrimination evoke sympathy, even empathy, but too rarely do they spur us to action or prompt us to question our own assumptions and privilege.
Apparently, a lot of people looked at this and said she wouldn’t have said this unless she felt that fear. So she is a racist.
But in fact the comment about fear was one of a long list of bad facts about racism in the States. And she said we must admit these features exist and get rid of them.
So the racism is most certainly not in her words. It is an injustice to report that it is in her head.
Many thanks to Rachek McKinnon for bringing this up on facebook. Of course, as Rachel said, on the left this might all just be misogyny. If so, hang on because it’s probably going to be a horrible election season.
“I’m Sorry!” July 7, 2015
The research reported in a post below concludes that women are disproportionately made to feel guilty for any lapses in caring behavior. If that’s true, one might expect to see (some/many) women as very prone to apologize a great deal, even for things only vaguely connected to them, to feel bad when they are especially assertive, and even to offer care-taking when it is hardly appropriately.
The skit by the comedian Amy Schumer linked to below captures such behavior. Can you relate?
The Black Widow Controversy May 6, 2015
There’s a great piece up at i09 on the controversy surrounding the representation of Black Widow in Age of Ultron — I’m leaving out anything with spoilers (which means I’m leaving out most of the interesting substance), but if you’ve already seen the film, the whole piece is worth reading:
But instead of sitting down at the table of the Internet and discussing these issues like calm, collected folk, the Internet responded as only the Internet knows how: with pile-ons and death threats.
The people who criticized Whedon publicly — which may or may not have spurred Whedon leaving the Internet — are, themselves, getting death threats. It’s a snake eating its own tail.
People have been writing about the many ways that the treatment of Black Widow has sucked, but that’s all going to get lost now. Instead, everyone’s going to talk about the abuse. And about Whedon, personally, instead of the work. But that’s just playing into the Internet’s many ongoing culture wars, and it’s going to ruin everything.
So, it’s time to sit down like big boys and girls at the adult table — and talk about this, without flipping the goddamn thing over.
Judge who said 14 year old victim was partly responsible for her own rape to be given an award April 30, 2015
Next month, less than a year after he was censured by the Montana Supreme Court for comments he made while sentencing a man who raped a 14-year-old girl, retired District Judge G. Todd Baugh will receive a lifetime achievement award from the Yellowstone Area Bar Association.
Marian Bradley, president of the Montana chapter of the National Organization for Women, said there is “something absolutely wrong” with members of the local bar giving Baugh the award, according to a report in Last Best News.
“Do they not have respect for the women and children of this community?” she said. “This is outrageous.” . . .
Baugh was censured by the state high court in July 2014 for his comments during the 2013 sentencing of Stacey Dean Rambold, who was a 47-year-old business teacher at Billings Senior High School when he raped Cherice Moralez, a student of his, in 2007.
Just before her 17th birthday in 2010, while charges against Rambold were still pending, Moralez committed suicide.
Rambold later pleaded guilty in the case.
Baugh was vilified across the country after he sentenced Rambold to 15 years in prison with all but 31 days suspended.
During the sentencing, he said the 14-year-old victim was “older than her chronological age” and “as much in control of the situation” as her abuser.
After his remarks went viral and sparked public protests in Billings and other cities, Baugh apologized for his comments and acknowledged that his lenient sentence in the case violated state law.
He tried to modify the sentence retroactively, but the Montana Supreme Court ruled that he could not revise a sentence he’d already handed down.
After the Supreme Court overturned Baugh’s sentence, another district judge sentenced Rambold to 15 years in prison with five years suspended.
Notre Dame under Title IX investigation April 18, 2015
The title above is for an article about Delivering Equality: Women and Success, a summit-conference at Cambridge University. The opening sentences by the article’s author, Alice Atkinson-Bonasio, tell one why both it and the summit are important:
The theme of gender inequality seems to evoke a certain sense of resistance from both men and women, who argue against “radical feminism” and suggest that women nowadays are empowered to follow whatever career path they choose and succeed on their merits.
The battle, in other words, has been won.
Indeed, as a woman enjoying the successful pursuit of my career of choice, it felt strange to be in a room with some of the most outstanding female researchers in the world to discuss how difficult it still is for a woman to progress in her academic career compared to her male counterparts.
The article is full of ideas and information, and anyone engaged in the area will probably find some of the material very interesting.
I’m going to concentrate on two things: the list of some of the important questions the summit ended up posing, and some of the talks, slide presentations and links to material that are available at the site. The first seem to me at times quite clarifying questions, one which organize the issues in good ways. The second will be very useful for a number of reasons. Entries can help those who haven’t really studied issues like that of implicit bias thoroughly enough to be able to discuss it in challenging contexts. There are videos that are suitable for sharing at meetings and in classes. In fact, the presentations and links are numerous enough that I’ve picked just three. Do go and discover more for yourselves!
There are two contributions by Jennifer Saul, who is a prominent contributor on this blog. My links to her in this post reflect the fact that she is featured in the article.
Some of the many burning questions that emerged from those conversations were:
- How can we create environments that attract and develop talented women, as well as men, throughout all levels of our institutions?
- To what extent are we genuinely committed to becoming more inclusive?
- How can we define, measure and reward success more effectively?
- How can we reframe the debate away from “women’s issues” to talk about effective, modern workplaces?
- What policies, procedures, training, metrics and systems can we improve in order to accelerate progress?
- How can we encourage the emergence of more diverse, visible role models and senior leaders progressing change in academia?